KodeXSOLUTIONS

QA · Test Automation · Software Development

Ship faster.
Break nothing.

KodeX Solutions tests, automates, and builds web software, so your team releases with confidence.

Built for E-commerce & retail, Insurance, Government & defense, Internal SaaS platforms

Laptop showing a passing automated test run on a desk

Test Automation

Maintainable frameworks that save time and reduce risk.

Regression & Smoke

Stable suites run on a cadence your team can plan around.

API & Database

Checks behind the UI, not just what the screen shows.

CI/CD Integration

Quality gates that run on every build, not after.

services, from audit to build
tools in our stack
steps, no black box
team that builds and tests

Find your starting point

What's your biggest QA headache?

CI/CD integration

Quality gates on every build.

Tests stop being a phase at the end and become a step in the pipeline you already run.

Commit. A pull request opens and checks start immediately, before anyone reviews.

Legacy & enterprise UIs

We automate the UIs others give up on.

Dynamic IDs, nested iframes, heavy data grids, and async rendering break brittle automation. We build for it from the start: resilient locators that don't rely on generated IDs, explicit waits tied to real application state instead of fixed sleeps, and reusable component wrappers for the grid and widget patterns your app repeats across screens.

  • ExtJS
  • GWT
  • PrimeNG
  • Kendo UI
  • 01Resilient, attribute-based locators
  • 02Explicit waits on application state
  • 03Reusable component wrappers for grids and widgets

Brittle

What breaks on legacy UIs

  • Generated IDs like ext-gen1042 change between renders
  • Absolute XPath breaks the day a wrapper div is added
  • Fixed sleeps are too slow when the app is fast and too short when it isn't

Resilient

What we build instead

  • Attribute-based locators survive layout and framework changes
  • Waits tied to application state, not the clock
  • One grid wrapper reused on every screen that has a grid

Illustrative example: the same test step, written two ways.

Approach

Four steps, no black box.

  1. 01

    Discover

    We map your application, existing coverage, and release process before writing a single test.

  2. 02

    Build

    We build or extend a framework matched to your stack, not a generic template.

  3. 03

    Run

    Suites run on a cadence or on every build, wired into the pipeline you already use.

  4. 04

    Report

    Every run produces a clear pass/fail dashboard with screenshots attached to failures, not a wall of logs.

Ready to release with confidence?